Rosario v. County of Cook et al
| Danny Rosario |
| County of Cook, Tom Dart and Cermak Health Services |
| 1:2021cv05505 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must pay the $402 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not comply by December 17, 2021, this case will be summarily dismissed. Plaintiff's motion for status #5 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on November 19, 2021. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Danny Rosario for status of in forma pauperis application. (cp, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Danny Rosario for attorney representation. (cp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Danny Rosario for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and financial affidavit. (Exhibits). (cp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (cp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Danny Rosario. (Exhibits). (cp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
