Smith v. Evans
| Walter Smith |
| Michelle Evans |
| 1:2021cv05580 |
| October 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FILED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Walter Smith (Envelope postmarked 10/14/2021) (bg, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/8/2021: Petitioner Walter Smith (Petitioner), currently confined at the Chester Mental Health Center, has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition in this Court. Petitioner contends that the Cook County Circuit Court never set a Thiem date after involuntarily committing him following his not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict. See People v. Thiem, 403 N.E.2d 647 (1980). The 2254 petition cannot proceed, however, as Petitioner has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee, nor submitted an in forma pauperis (IFP) application demonstrating his inability to pay. By December 13, 2021, Petitioner must satisfy the filing fee either by paying it with a check or money order (made payable to Clerk, United States District Court) to the Clerk, United States District Court, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, attn: Cashier's Desk, 20th Floor, or by submitting a completed IFP application that includes, if available, a copy of his trust fund account at his facility. An official at his facility should be able to assist if needed. The Clerk of Court shall send an IFP application to Petitioner, along with a copy of this order. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in summary dismissal of this case without prejudice. See N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.3(f). Mailed notice (axc).
|
| MAILED copy of Order #5 and a blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (IFP) to Petitioner Walter Smith. (axc). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction regarding PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Walter Smith against Michelle Evans #1 (cp, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (cp, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (cp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus and 0 copies filed by Walter Smith against Michelle Evans. (Envelope postmarked 10/14/2021). (cp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Evans | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Walter Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michelle Evans | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
