Williams v. Iverson et al
Terrence T. Williams |
J. Iverson, Michael Reilly, Lt. Baker, ERT Cherry, ERT Danhour, Warden Santerelli, Tony Richards, Vincent L. Perillo, Jenn, Beth and Will County Road Call Sheriff Deputy |
1:2021cv05602 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Franklin U Valderrama |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
MAILED copy of Order #7 to Plaintiff Terrence T Williams. (axc). |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT in support of recusal of Judge Valderrama. (Envelope postmark date 11/29/21). (gcy, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams for recusal of Judge Franklin U. Valderrama supported with affidavit. (Envelope postmark date 11/29/21). (gcy, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (Attachments). (No envelope postmark date). (gcy, ) |
MAILED I.F.P. Form to Terrence T. Williams. (gcy, ) |
|
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Terrence T. Williams. (Attachments). (No Envelope postmark date). (gcy, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.