Nanlawala v. CITY OF CHICAGO
| Nilofer Nanlawala |
| CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 1:2021cv05624 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STATUS Report by Nilofer Nanlawala (Abraham, Christina) |
| Filing 7 First AMENDED complaint by Nilofer Nanlawala against CITY OF CHICAGO (Abraham, Christina) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Nilofer Nanlawala regarding Complaint, Summons, Order served on Antoinette Pacheco on 12/3/2021 (Abraham, Christina) |
| ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant CITY OF CHICAGO. (dxb, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nilofer Nanlawala by S. Janaan Hashim (Hashim, S. Janaan) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 12/15/2021, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 12/22/2021 at 8:55 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nilofer Nanlawala by Christina W. Abraham (Abraham, Christina) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Abraham, Christina) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant CITY OF CHICAGO (rp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nilofer Nanlawala; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18794821.(Abraham, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nanlawala v. CITY OF CHICAGO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nilofer Nanlawala | |
| Represented By: | Christina W. Abraham |
| Represented By: | S. Janaan Hashim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
