Hassan v. Monarch Recovery Management Inc
| Shabbir Hassan |
| Monarch Recovery Management Inc |
| 1:2021cv05720 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #6 is granted to 12/27/21. Telephonic status hearing set for 1/5/21 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 12/30/21. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-808-6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Monarch Recovery Management Inc for extension of time to file answer (Hoffman, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shabbir Hassan as to Monarch Recovery Management Inc on 10/29/2021, answer due 11/19/2021. (Pigozzi, Stephen) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Monarch Recovery Management Inc. (ng, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shabbir Hassan by Stephen J Pigozzi (Pigozzi, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shabbir Hassan by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shabbir Hassan by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shabbir Hassan ; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18808754. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Edelman, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hassan v. Monarch Recovery Management Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shabbir Hassan | |
| Represented By: | Tara Leigh Goodwin |
| Represented By: | Stephen J Pigozzi |
| Represented By: | Daniel A. Edelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monarch Recovery Management Inc | |
| Represented By: | Timothy V. Hoffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
