Call v. Logan
| Charles G. Call |
| James D. Logan |
| 1:2021cv05859 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #9 is granted. Responsive pleading to be filed on or before 1/12/2022. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Defendant James D. Logan for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Shah, Kalpesh)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant James D. Logan by Kalpesh K Shah (Shah, Kalpesh)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charles G. Call as to James D. Logan on 11/13/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. (kl, )
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Telephone status hearing is set for 1/5/2022 at 10:30 AM. The call-in number is (877)336-1829 and the access code is 5205245. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant James D. Logan (kl, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Charles G. Call (kl, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Charles G. Call. (kl, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Call v. Logan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles G. Call | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James D. Logan | |
| Represented By: | Kalpesh K Shah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
