Heags v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff: Malcolm Heags
Defendant: Department of Veterans Affairs
Case Number: 1:2021cv06212
Filed: November 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Malcolm Heags by Thomas Mccarthy Cramer (Cramer, Thomas)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Malcolm Heags regarding Complaint, Civil Cover Page, Summons, and Attorney Appearance served on Merrick Garland, Attorney General on 11/29/2021 (Cramer, Amy)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Malcolm Heags regarding Complaint, Civil Cover Page, Summons, and Attorney Appearance served on US Attorney, NDIL John R. Lausch, Jr. on 11/29/2021 (Cramer, Amy)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Malcolm Heags regarding Complaint, Civil Cover Page, Summons, and Attorney Appearance served on Denis McDonough, Secretary of VA on 11/29/2021 (Cramer, Amy)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (dxb, )
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Malcolm Heags by Amy S Cramer (Cramer, Amy)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cramer, Amy)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Malcolm Heags; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18892816. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Cramer, Amy)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, )
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heags v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malcolm Heags
Represented By: Amy S Cramer
Represented By: Thomas Mccarthy Cramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Veterans Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?