Mercil v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.
William Mercil |
Jewel Food Stores, Inc. d/b/a Jewel-Osco, a division of New Albertsons, LP and Jewel Food Stores, Inc. |
1:2021cv06220 |
November 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles R Norgle |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Jewel Food Stores, Inc.(Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for leave to file #10 is moot; Amended Motion for leave to file first amended complaint #11 is granted. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff William Mercil to amend/correct MOTION by Plaintiff William Mercil for leave to file Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #10 (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint)(Haines, Nicollette) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff William Mercil for leave to file Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint)(Haines, Nicollette) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for extension of time to file its responsive pleading up to and including December 17, 2021 #8 is granted. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Jewel Food Stores, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Second Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email)(Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for extension of time up to and including December 3, 2021 to file a responsive pleading #6 is granted. Mailed notice (ewf, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Jewel Food Stores, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lxk, ) |
Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Jewel Food Stores, Inc. d/b/a Jewel-Osco, a division of New Albertsons, LP by Jennifer L. Schilling (Schilling, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2021L5440) filed by Jewel Food Stores, Inc. d/b/a Jewel-Osco, a division of New Albertsons, LP Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18893933. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit C - Notice to Adverse Party, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to State Court)(Schilling, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.