Johnson v. Manson et al
Plaintiff: Llyod Johnson
Defendant: C/O Manson and Tom Dart
Case Number: 1:2021cv06310
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2021 Filing 6 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court on its own motion dismisses this action as duplicative of Johnson v. C/O Manson, et al., Case No. 21 C 5673 (N.D. Ill.) (filed 10/25/21; initial review of complaint pending resolution of fee status). The two complaints are identical in substance. The Court therefore directs the Clerk to administratively close this case. Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and for attorney representation #4 are denied as moot. Civil case closed. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/14/2021. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
November 24, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Llyod Johnson for attorney representation. (cp, )
November 24, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Llyod Johnson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit). (cp, )
November 24, 2021 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (cp, )
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Llyod Johnson. (Exhibits)(Envelope postmarked 11/16/21). (cp, )
November 24, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (cp, )
November 24, 2021 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cp, )
November 24, 2021 MAILED copy of Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Lloyd Johnson. (cp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Manson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Llyod Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Manson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Dart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?