Washington v. American Coradius International LLC
Chinita Washington |
American Coradius International LLC |
1:2021cv06479 |
December 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 RESPONSE by American Coradius International LLC to MOTION by Plaintiff Chinita Washington to remand to remand to state court #12 (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: The Court adopts the parties' proposed briefing schedule on the Plaintiff's motion to remand to state court #12 : Defendant's response is due 1/20/22; Plaintiff's reply in support is due 2/3/22; and the motion is taken under advisement. The Court will issue a ruling by mail. Notice of motion date of 1/6/22 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 15 STATUS Report (Joint Case Plan Per 12/9/2021 Order) by Chinita Washington (Bardo, Stacy) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and affirmative defenses by American Coradius International LLC(Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Bryan Paul Thompson for presentment of motion to remand #12 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 1/6/2022 at 09:15 AM. (Thompson, Bryan) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Chinita Washington to remand to remand to state court (Thompson, Bryan) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted to and including 12/24/2021. Notice of motion date of 12/14/2021 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Joint discovery plan, including (a) agreed briefing schedule on any motion filed as a responsive pleading, (b) proposed discovery plan, and (c) statement in regard to any settlement discussions or interest in a referral to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference, is due no later than 1/6/2022. Emailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Morgan Ian Marcus for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 12/14/2021 at 09:15 AM. (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant American Coradius International LLC for extension of time to file answer unopposed (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (exr, ) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Stacy Michelle Bardo (Bardo, Stacy) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Robert W. Harrer (Harrer, Robert) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Bryan Paul Thompson (Thompson, Bryan) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by American Coradius International LLC (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021CH05209) filed by American Coradius International LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18932613. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant American Coradius International LLC by Morgan Ian Marcus (Marcus, Morgan) |
Filing 1 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant American Coradius International LLC by Andrew E Cunningham (Cunningham, Andrew) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.