Washington v. American Coradius International LLC
Plaintiff: Chinita Washington
Defendant: American Coradius International LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv06479
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Robert M Dow
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE by American Coradius International LLC to MOTION by Plaintiff Chinita Washington to remand to remand to state court #12 (Marcus, Morgan)
January 4, 2022 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: The Court adopts the parties' proposed briefing schedule on the Plaintiff's motion to remand to state court #12 : Defendant's response is due 1/20/22; Plaintiff's reply in support is due 2/3/22; and the motion is taken under advisement. The Court will issue a ruling by mail. Notice of motion date of 1/6/22 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Emailed notice (cdh, )
January 4, 2022 Filing 15 STATUS Report (Joint Case Plan Per 12/9/2021 Order) by Chinita Washington (Bardo, Stacy)
December 21, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and affirmative defenses by American Coradius International LLC(Marcus, Morgan)
December 17, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Bryan Paul Thompson for presentment of motion to remand #12 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 1/6/2022 at 09:15 AM. (Thompson, Bryan)
December 17, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Chinita Washington to remand to remand to state court (Thompson, Bryan)
December 9, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted to and including 12/24/2021. Notice of motion date of 12/14/2021 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. Joint discovery plan, including (a) agreed briefing schedule on any motion filed as a responsive pleading, (b) proposed discovery plan, and (c) statement in regard to any settlement discussions or interest in a referral to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference, is due no later than 1/6/2022. Emailed notice (cdh, )
December 6, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Morgan Ian Marcus for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 12/14/2021 at 09:15 AM. (Marcus, Morgan)
December 6, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant American Coradius International LLC for extension of time to file answer unopposed (Marcus, Morgan)
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (exr, )
December 3, 2021 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Stacy Michelle Bardo (Bardo, Stacy)
December 3, 2021 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Robert W. Harrer (Harrer, Robert)
December 3, 2021 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chinita Washington by Bryan Paul Thompson (Thompson, Bryan)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by American Coradius International LLC (Marcus, Morgan)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2021CH05209) filed by American Coradius International LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18932613. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marcus, Morgan)
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant American Coradius International LLC by Morgan Ian Marcus (Marcus, Morgan)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant American Coradius International LLC by Andrew E Cunningham (Cunningham, Andrew)
December 3, 2021 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, )
December 3, 2021 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. American Coradius International LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chinita Washington
Represented By: Bryan Paul Thompson
Represented By: Robert W. Harrer
Represented By: Stacy Michelle Bardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Coradius International LLC
Represented By: Morgan Ian Marcus
Represented By: Andrew E Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?