Morgan v. Brookhart
Randy Morgan |
Dee Dee Brookhart |
1:2021cv06613 |
December 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 1/3/2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. Petitioner must complete his state court proceedings before bringing a new habeas corpus petition. This dismissal does not count towards the prohibition on unauthorized second or successive habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b). See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 489 (2000). Any pending motions are moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 1/3/2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 6 LETTER from Randy Morgan dated 12/15/2021. (Envelope postmarked 12/18/2021) (daj, ) |
Filing 5 MAILED Prisoner Local Rule 83.15 Letter to all parties of record. (ph, ) |
Filing 4 RECEIVED from Illinois Southern; Case Number 3:21-cv-01498. (ph, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Randy Morgan. (ph, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 12/1/2021. (arm) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 12/10/2021.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and filing fee. Your case number is 21-1498-DWD. The following is important information concerning the initial stages of your lawsuit. The Court will review your petition to determine whether it survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in an Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you do not receive a preliminary review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel, it will not be considered until the Court has completed the preliminary review of your petition. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). In the event your petition survives the preliminary review, the Court will instruct the respondent to file a response to the petition and you will be notified of your deadline to file a reply. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 11/29/2021. (kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 12/10/2021.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Randy Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit part 1, #2 Exhibit part 2, #3 Envelope)(kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 12/10/2021.] |
Filing fee paid in full: $ 5.00, receipt number 346251106651 (jaj) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 12/10/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morgan v. Brookhart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Randy Morgan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dee Dee Brookhart | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.