Charles Warrick v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Charles Warrick |
1:2021cv06881 |
December 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Kate F Lambert as U.S. Attorney for Defendant THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Lambert, Kate) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 3/14/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (cxr, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for executor plaintiff Charles Warrick by Jared M Reynolds (Reynolds, Jared) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Reynolds, Jared) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charles Warrick; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19002833. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letters of Office Appointing Administrator of Estate, #2 Affidavit Attorney's Affidavit & Health Professional's Report per 735 ILCS 5/2-622)(Reynolds, Jared) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Charles Warrick v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Kate F Lambert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Executor: Charles Warrick | |
Represented By: | Jared M Reynolds |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.