Al Doos v. Wolf et al
| Rami Al Doos |
| Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, Mike Pompeo, Director FBI Christopher A. Wray, David M. Satterfield, Thomas Cioppa, Chad Wolf and Christopher A. Wray |
| 1:2022cv00133 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, David M. Satterfield, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, David M. Satterfield, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 3/24/22 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 3/17/22. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw== (ca, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rami Al Doos by Reem H Odeh (Odeh, Reem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rami Al Doos; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19038856. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Odeh, Reem) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Thomas Cioppa, Mike Pompeo, David M. Satterfield, Chad Wolf, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (sxh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
