Mendoza v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
| Consuelo Mendoza |
| Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00310 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 7, the Court sets the following discovery schedule. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 03/04/2022. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 03/18/2022. Fact discovery must be completed by 07/22/2022. **No summary judgment motion may be filed before the close of fact discovery without prior authorization of the Court.** Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or amend pleadings is 05/02/2022. The deadline to serve subpoenas is 06/06/2022, absent good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). By 06/22/2022, the parties shall file a Deposition Scheduling Report listing the depositions already taken and (more importantly) the remaining deponents, all of whom must have ***confirmed*** deposition dates (not just proposed dates). Any person not on that Report will presumptively not be deposed without good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). If deponents are slow in confirming deposition dates, the parties should use the Report deadline to urge each other and non-parties to provide confirmed dates to avoid a motion to compel in advance of the deadline. The parties do not anticipate expert discovery at this time. The tracking status hearing of 02/18/2022 is reset to 04/22/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery progress report by 04/13/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by Consuelo Mendoza (Thompson, Bryan) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 02/18/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 02/08/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Midland Credit Management, Inc.(Thomas, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 MAILED notice of removal letter to all counsel of record. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. by Kevin A Thomas (Thomas, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Thomas, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, First Municipal District, Civil Division, case number (20211126473) filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19069378. Notice of Removal with Exhibit (Complaint) attached (Thomas, Kevin) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendoza v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Consuelo Mendoza | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Paul Thompson |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Harrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin A Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
