Neamonitis v. Tsekeris et al
Plaintiff: Nicolaos Neamonitis
Defendant: Alexandros T. Tsekeris, Linardakis D. Konstantinos, Grigaliuna Darius, Ylli Karaqica, Konstantinos D. Linardakis and Darius Grigaliuna
Case Number: 1:2022cv00443
Filed: January 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Marvin E Aspen
Referring Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2022 Filing 26 DECLARATION of GREGORY A. NAHAS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Nahas, Gregory)
March 25, 2022 Filing 25 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) (Nahas, Gregory)
March 25, 2022 Filing 24 MOTION BY PLAINTIFF FOR ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF SERVICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) by Nicolaos Neamonitis (Nahas, Gregory)
March 24, 2022 Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The joint extension motion #22 to answer field by Defendants Karaquica, Linardakis, and Grigaliuna is granted to 04/25/2022. The tracking status hearing of 04/01/2022 is reset to 05/06/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery progress report by 04/29/2022, and the Plaintiff shall file an update on service as to Defendant Tsekeris in the report (or file an appropriate extension motion if needed). Mailed notice (ags)
March 23, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION by Defendant Ylli Karaqica for extension of time to file answer (Joint) (Mroczkowski, Steven)
March 15, 2022 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant Linardakis' extension motion #19 to answer is terminated as unnecessary, because the Court already granted an extension to 03/24/2022 to answer. See R. 18. Again, the Court will consider an additional reasonable request if necessary. R. 18. The Clerk's Office shall enter Defendnat Linardakis' contact information on the docket for a pro se appearance: 1930 Lake Point Dr. Weston, FL 33326, 630-244-5667, dlinardakis@yahoo.com. See R. 19 at 2. Emailed notice (mw, )
March 14, 2022 Filing 21 PRO SE Appearance by Defendant Konstantinos D. Linardakis. (ph, )
March 13, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION by Defendant Konstantinos D. Linardakis for extension of time to file answer. (ph, )
March 11, 2022 Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 17, the unopposed extension request of Defendant Linardakis to answer or to respond to the complaint is granted, for now till 03/24/2022. The Court will consider a reasonable extension motion if he is imminently about to retain counsel. Linardakis shall file a Pro Se Appearance Form so that he can receive notices of filings (the form is available on the District Court's website). The Plaintiff has not yet been able to serve Defendant Tsekeris (the 90-day deadline will expire in late 04/2022). The following discovery schedule is set for now, with possible changes needed depending on what answers or motions are filed on 03/24/2022. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 04/25/2022. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 05/02/2022. Fact discovery must be completed by 12/02/2022. **No summary judgment motion may be filed before the close of fact discovery without prior authorization of the Court.** Any retained-expert discovery schedule will be set later. With regard to consent to the magistrate judge, when all Defendants are in the case, the parties shall confer again to decide whether they all consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge (including to enter final judgment). The tracking status hearing of 03/18/2022 is reset to 04/01/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). The Court will review the docket in advance of the tracking date. Mailed notice (mw, )
March 10, 2022 Filing 17 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT by Nicolaos Neamonitis (Nahas, Gregory)
March 2, 2022 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The unopposed extension motion of Defendant Ylli Karaqica to answer #15 is granted to 03/24/2022. The status report deadline of 03/10/2022 remains in place, in part to find out the status of service on Defendant Tsekeris. Emailed notice (mw, )
February 28, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Darius Grigaliuna for extension of time (Henry, Bernard)
February 25, 2022 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The unopposed extension motion to answer filed by Defendant Karaqica #12 is granted to 03/24/2022. With regard to Defendants Grigaliuna and Linardakis, the answer deadlines are either expired of fast approaching, so they should file extension motions as appropriate or risk being deemed in default. The status report deadline of 03/10/2022 remains in place, in part to find out the status of service on Defendant Tsekeris. Emailed notice (mw, )
February 23, 2022 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Darius Grigaliuna by Bernard Anthony Henry (Henry, Bernard)
February 18, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Ylli Karaqica for extension of time to file answer Uncontested (Mroczkowski, Steven)
February 18, 2022 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ylli Karaqica by Steven David Mroczkowski (Mroczkowski, Steven)
February 7, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicolaos Neamonitis as to Ylli Karaqica on 2/1/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. (Nahas, Gregory)
February 7, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicolaos Neamonitis as to Darius Grigaliuna on 2/5/2022, answer due 2/28/2022. (Nahas, Gregory)
February 7, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicolaos Neamonitis as to Konstantinos D. Linardakis on 2/5/2022, answer due 2/28/2022. (Nahas, Gregory)
February 1, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 03/18/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 03/10/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) (Main Document #7 replaced on 2/1/2022) (mw, ).
February 1, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Gregory Hahas' motion to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff #4 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, )
January 27, 2022 Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/27/2022. (ph, )
January 27, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Darius Grigaliuna, Ylli Karaqica, Konstantinos D. Linardakis, Alexandros T. Tsekeris (lxk, )
January 26, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19091985. 1:22-cv-00443 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kozonis, Loukas)
January 26, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nicolaos Neamonitis by Loukas Demetrios Kozonis (Kozonis, Loukas)
January 26, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kozonis, Loukas)
January 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT 1:22-cv-00443 filed by Nicolaos Neamonitis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19091623.(Kozonis, Loukas)
January 26, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, )
January 26, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neamonitis v. Tsekeris et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicolaos Neamonitis
Represented By: Loukas Demetrios Kozonis
Represented By: Gregory A. Nahas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexandros T. Tsekeris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linardakis D. Konstantinos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grigaliuna Darius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ylli Karaqica
Represented By: Steven David Mroczkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Konstantinos D. Linardakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darius Grigaliuna
Represented By: Bernard Anthony Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?