Chervon (HK) Limited et al v. One World Technologies, Inc. et al
| Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc. and Homelite Consumer Products, Inc. |
| One World Technologies, Inc. and Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. |
| Greenberg Traurig, LLP and Keith Jarosik |
| 1:2022cv00477 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Patent |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Defendant's motion for leave to file documents under seal #10 is granted. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
| Filing 11 REPLY by Movants Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Keith Jarosik in Support of Motion to Quash (Lukas, James) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendants Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. to seal document sealed document, #8 - Opposition To Greenberg Traurig, LLP's And Keith Jarosik's Motion To Quash And Motion For A Protective Order - (Roberson, Ferlillia) |
| Filing 9 Opposition To Greenberg Traurig, LLP's And Keith Jarosik's Motion To Quash And Motion For A Protective Order (REDACTED) - ECF No. #1 by Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C (REDACTED), #4 Exhibit D (REDACTED), #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit F)(Roberson, Ferlillia) |
| Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendants Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. - Opposition To Greenberg Traurig, LLP's And Keith Jarosik's Motion To Quash And Motion For A Protective Order - (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Roberson, Ferlillia) |
| Filing 7 AGREED ORDER GRANTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON NON-PARTIES GREENBERG, TRAURIG, LLP'S AND KEITH JAROSIK'S MOTION TO QUASH ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC'S, TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.'S AND HOMELITE CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.'S SUBPOENAS AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle on 2/18/2022. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. by Stephanie Haeun Lim (Lim, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. by Ferlillia V. Roberson (Roberson, Ferlillia) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (exr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Movants Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Keith Jarosik by Benjamin Patrick Gilford (Gilford, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Movants Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Keith Jarosik by James J. Lukas, Jr (Lukas, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Greenberg Traurig, LLP (Lukas, James) |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE by Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Keith Jarosik Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Motion for a Protective Order Filing fee $ 49, receipt number 0752-19097451. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lukas, James) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
