Miskowicz v. Blinken et al
Plaintiff: Marcin Miskowicz
Defendant: Antony Blinken and Peggy Petrovich
Case Number: 1:2022cv00513
Filed: January 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Joint written status report due by 4/29/2022. Mailed notice (cp, )
February 22, 2022 Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich (Treacy, Elizabeth)
February 22, 2022 Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich (Oswald, Craig)
January 28, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marcin Miskowicz by Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure (Mcclure, Lauren)
January 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mcclure, Lauren)
January 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Declaratory Judgment and Other Relief filed by Marcin Miskowicz; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19101881.(Mcclure, Lauren)
January 28, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cm, )
January 28, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, )
January 28, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (ey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miskowicz v. Blinken et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcin Miskowicz
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peggy Petrovich
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?