Rare Beauty, LLC v. RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC
| Rare Beauty, LLC |
| RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC |
| 1:2022cv00533 |
| January 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Compliance with Procedures for Voluntary Mediation Program for Lanham Act Cases (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Written Status Report due by 4/29/2022. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
| Filing 8 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (ph, ) |
| Filing 7 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (ph, ) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rare Beauty, LLC. RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC waiver sent on 2/1/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC (ak, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
| Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Rare Beauty, LLC (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by Rare Beauty, LLC (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rare Beauty, LLC by Monica M. Gutierrez (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gutierrez, Monica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Rare Beauty, LLC; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19104782.(Gutierrez, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rare Beauty, LLC v. RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rare Beauty, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Monica M. Gutierrez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RareBeauty Cosmetics LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
