Hawthorne Development Corporation v. Landmark American Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Hawthorne Development Corporation
Defendant: Landmark American Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv00629
Filed: February 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey Cummings
Referring Judge: Martha M Pacold
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report and discovery plan #21 and adopts the parties' proposed fact discovery completion date of 8/29/22. In addition, the parties shall exchange Rule 26(a) disclosures by 3/24/22; propound written discovery by 4/20/22; and amend pleadings (if any) by 6/15/22. The Court will set an expert discovery schedule and dispositive motions schedule at a later date. By 5/25/22, the parties shall file a joint status report setting forth what discovery has been completed, what discovery remains, and whether any discovery disputes require the Court's attention. The parties are advised that they may contact the Court's courtroom deputy if they become mutually interested in scheduling a settlement conference with the Court. Mailed notice (cc, )
March 2, 2022 Filing 21 STATUS Report by Hawthorne Development Corporation (Schick, Thomas)
March 2, 2022 Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hawthorne Development Corporation by Thomas John Kupchinsky Schick (Schick, Thomas)
February 16, 2022 Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings:This case has been referred for discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement #18 . On or before 3/2/22, the parties are ordered to have a Rule 26(f) conference and file a joint status report setting forth the information for Referral Cases in the Court's Standing Order for Initial Joint Status Reports. The parties shall also include a proposed discovery schedule in their joint status report. If the parties are mutually interested in a settlement conference, they shall also address the issues set forth in the first paragraph of the second page of the Court's Standing Order For Settlement Conferences and provide the dates that the parties are mutually available in April and May 2022 for a remote video settlement conference. The deadlines for the submission of settlement letters described in the Standing Order and the date for the settlement conference will be promptly set after the joint status report is received. Mailed notice (cc, )
February 15, 2022 Filing 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Jeffrey Cummings for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. (rao, )
February 14, 2022 Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company by Carey Michael Johnson (Johnson, Carey)
February 14, 2022 Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company by Thomas Kearney Wingfield (Wingfield, Thomas)
February 14, 2022 Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hawthorne Development Corporation by Benjamin Timothy Weber (Weber, Benjamin)
February 14, 2022 Filing 14 STATUS Report by Hawthorne Development Corporation (Schwartz, Marty)
February 14, 2022 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hawthorne Development Corporation by Marty Jay Schwartz (Schwartz, Marty)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Thomas K. Wingfield's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Landmark American Insurance Company #11 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/11/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, )
February 10, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19146029. (Wingfield, Thomas)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Carey Michael Johnson's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Landmark American Insurance Company #9 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/9/2022. Mailed notice(gcy, )
February 9, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19138548. (Johnson, Carey)
February 7, 2022 Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (kl, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 2/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, )
February 4, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Landmark American Insurance Company(Swinehart, James)
February 4, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company by Kelly Anne McElvogue Jorgensen (Jorgensen, Kelly)
February 4, 2022 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Landmark American Insurance Company (Swinehart, James)
February 4, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company by James R. Swinehart (Swinehart, James)
February 4, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Swinehart, James)
February 4, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, IL, Chancery, case number (2022CH00049) filed by Landmark American Insurance Company Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19124432. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Swinehart, James)
February 4, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, )
February 4, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawthorne Development Corporation v. Landmark American Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hawthorne Development Corporation
Represented By: Marty Jay Schwartz
Represented By: Benjamin Timothy Weber
Represented By: Thomas John Kupchinsky Schick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark American Insurance Company
Represented By: James R. Swinehart
Represented By: Kelly Anne McElvogue Jorgensen
Represented By: Carey Michael Johnson
Represented By: Thomas Kearney Wingfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?