Hussam Al-Nahhas v. Rosebud Lending LZO et al
Plaintiff: EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS and Mohammad Al-Nahhas
Defendant: ROSEBUD LENDING LZO d/b/a ZocaLoans, 777 PARTNERS LLC, TACTICAL MARKETING PARTNERS, LLC, Rosebud Lending LZO doing business as ZocaLoans and John Does 1-20
Case Number: 1:2022cv00750
Filed: February 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Attorney Oscar A. Gomez's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #7 is granted. Mailed notice (air, )
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19238325. (Gomez, Oscar)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eido Hussam Al-Nahhas as to 777 PARTNERS LLC on 2/18/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Goldstein, Matthew)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eido Hussam Al-Nahhas as to Tactical Marketing Partners, LLC on 2/15/2022, answer due 3/8/2022. (Goldstein, Matthew)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants 777 PARTNERS LLC, ROSEBUD LENDING LZO d/b/a ZocaLoans, TACTICAL MARKETING PARTNERS, LLC (cm, )
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS by Matthew J. Goldstein (Goldstein, Matthew)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Class Action filed by EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19144591. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Edelman, Daniel)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, )
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hussam Al-Nahhas v. Rosebud Lending LZO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EIDO HUSSAM AL-NAHHAS
Represented By: Matthew J. Goldstein
Represented By: Tara Leigh Goodwin
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammad Al-Nahhas
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Represented By: Matthew J. Goldstein
Represented By: Tara Leigh Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSEBUD LENDING LZO d/b/a ZocaLoans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 777 PARTNERS LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TACTICAL MARKETING PARTNERS, LLC
Represented By: Oscar A Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosebud Lending LZO doing business as ZocaLoans
Represented By: Oscar A Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?