Shah v. PayPal, Inc. et al
| Vivek Shah |
| PayPal, Inc. and Daniel H. Schulman |
| 1:2022cv00795 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Stipulation of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed on 4/8/2022 #19 . Case is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, against defendants PAYPAL, INC. and DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and for each party to bear their own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (cp, ) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice (Shah, Vivek) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: A briefing schedule is set for Defendants Paypal, Inc. and Daniel H. Schulman's motion to dismiss the verified complaint and to compel arbitration #13 : Response is due by 4/18/2022 and Reply is due by 4/25/2022. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Erica Conklin Baines regarding motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #13 , memorandum in support of motion #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Storino, Timothy) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Michelle Squires regarding memorandum in support of motion #15 , motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12)(Storino, Timothy) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM by PayPal, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #13 (Storino, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by PayPal, Inc. (Storino, Timothy) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 3/25/2022) (jg, ). |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendants Daniel H. Schulman, PayPal, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss the Verified Complaint and to Compel Arbitration (Storino, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Unopposed motion for extension of time for defendants Paypal and Daniel H. Schulman to respond to complaint #10 is granted. Defendants to respond to the Complaint up to and including 3/24/2022. Motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #11 is granted. Mailed notice (cp, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19233181. (Baines, Erica) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendants PayPal, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman Unopposed Motion for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #6 (Storino, Timothy) Modified on 3/9/2022 (kl, ). |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants PayPal, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman by Timothy Joseph Storino (Storino, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vivek Shah as to PayPal, Inc. on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. (Shah, Vivek) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vivek Shah as to Daniel H. Schulman on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. (Shah, Vivek) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Vivek Shah; Jury Demand. (kl, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants PayPal, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman; mailed to plaintiff for service as to defendants. (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Vivek Shah (exr, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (exr, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Vivek Shah (exr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (exr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
