Mendoza v Smith
Plaintiff: Jose Mendoza
Defendant: Iwan Smith and City of Chicago Illinois
Case Number: 1:2022cv00827
Filed: February 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The City's unopposed extension motion #7 to answer is granted to 05/20/2022. After the anticipated service of the individual Defendant, the same answer deadline shall apply to that Defendant. The Plaintiff shall promptly serve the individual Defendant so that the answer deadline can apply to both Defendants. The tracking status hearing of 04/08/2022 is reset to 06/03/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 05/27/2022. Emailed notice (mw, )
March 17, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago Illinois for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 UNOPPOSED (Griff, Jessica)
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago Illinois by Jessica L Griff (Griff, Jessica)
February 22, 2022 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Thomas T. Glasgow's motion for leave to appear as additional counsel for Plaintiff #3 is granted. Initial tracking status hearing set for 04/08/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 03/30/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
February 16, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bischoff, Jerry)
February 16, 2022 Filing 3 Jose Mendoza MOTION by Plaintiff Jose Mendoza for leave to appear as Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Mendoza (Glasgow, Thomas)
February 16, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, )
February 16, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, )
February 15, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jose Mendoza by Jerry D. Bischoff (Bischoff, Jerry)
February 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jose Mendoza; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19159505.(Bischoff, Jerry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Mendoza
Represented By: Jerry D. Bischoff
Represented By: Thomas T. Glasgow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iwan Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago Illinois
Represented By: Jessica L Griff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?