Beszhak v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Jenna Beszhak |
Consumers Cooperative Credit Union, Consumers Credit Union f and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
1:2022cv00862 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ronald A Guzman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(Fogarty, Clare) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice (Agreed) (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Defendant Consumers Cooperative Credit Union's unopposed motion for extension of time through April 6, 2022 to file responsive pleadings #12 is granted. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Consumers Cooperative Credit Union for extension of time to file responsive pleadings (Adams, Michael) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Consumers Cooperative Credit Union by Michael Paul Adams Appearance (Adams, Michael) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Defendant Experian Information Solution's Inc.'s unopposed motion for extension of time through 4/11/2022 to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Fogarty, Clare) |
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Fogarty, Clare) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. by Clare Elizabeth Fogarty (Fogarty, Clare) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jenna Beszhak as to Consumers Cooperative Credit Union on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jenna Beszhak as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on 2/21/2022, answer due 3/14/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Consumers Cooperative Credit Union, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (lxk, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jenna Beszhak by Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jenna Beszhak by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jenna Beszhak by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jenna Beszhak; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19164368. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.