Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. 815 Pallets Inc. et al
| Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company |
| 815 PALLETS INC. dba CALCO PALLETS, LLC, RANDALL LEWIS TAYLOR and 815 Pallets Inc an Illinois corporation doing business as Calco Pallets, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00909 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal #11 filed by plaintiff on 3/23/2022. The status report filing date of 4/29/2022 is stricken. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court will give the parties until 4/29/2022 to file the initial joint status report. (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. 815 Pallets Inc waiver sent on 2/22/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. Randall Lewis Taylor waiver sent on 2/22/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 4/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to RANDALL LEWIS TAYLOR on 02/22/22 by Plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. Waiver of service due by 3/29/2022. (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to 815 PALLETS INC. d/b/a CALCO PALLETS, LLC on 02/22/22 by Plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. Waiver of service due by 3/29/2022. (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 7.1 Disclosure by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company by Matthew R Bloom (Bloom, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19173492. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bloom, Matthew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
