Krawczyk v. Kijakazi
Joseph Krawczyk |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
1:2022cv00988 |
February 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jeffrey T Gilbert |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Winston, Paraisia) |
Filing 12 COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Krawczyk, (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 is granted. No service necessary under Local Rule 4(b). Mailed notice (ber, ) |
Filing 10 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Joseph Krawczyk (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. A briefing schedule will be set after the Administrative Record is filed. The parties shall file a joint status report 3/14/22 and advise whether the Claimant in this case (or a related minor) was the claimant in a prior case decided by a judge of this court that was remanded to the Social Security Commissioner within the meaning of Local Rule 40.3(c) and, if so, provide the case number for that prior case. Mailed notice (ber, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 3/4/2022. (ph, ) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Paraisia Rene Winston as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Winston, Paraisia) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Additionally, on or before the deadline for the filing of the administrative record, the parties shall file a joint status report in which they indicate (i) whether the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (ii) whether they will agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, they shall execute and file with the Court the joint consent form included as part of the Clerk's Notice previously filed in this case. If the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner, they must file an agreed motion for remand. Mailed notice (axc). |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joseph Krawczyk for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Krawczyk by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Krawczyk; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Krawczyk v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph Krawczyk | |
Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Paraisia Rene Winston |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.