Wepay Global Payments LLC v. McDonald's Corporation
Wepay Global Payments LLC |
McDonald's Corporation |
1:2022cv01064 |
March 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Harry D Leinenweber |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Join motion to continue the status #6 is granted. Telephone Conference set for 5/4/22 is re-set to 6/1/22 at 9:15 a.m. Joint status report shall be filed by 5/26/22. Dial: 888-684-8852 or 215-446-0155, access code: 9582710#. Mailed notice (maf) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Wepay Global Payments LLC to continue Joint Initial Status Report and Initial Case Management Conference AGREED (Wawrzyn, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wepay Global Payments LLC by Matthew Michael Wawrzyn (Wawrzyn, Matthew) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant McDonald's Corporation (cm, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Telephonic status conference is set for 5/4/22 at 9:15 a.m. Joint status report shall be filed by 4/25/22. Dial: 888-684-8852 or 215-446-0155, access code: 9582710#. Mailed notice (maf) |
Filing 3 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (rc, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Wawrzyn, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Design-Patent Infringement filed by Wepay Global Payments LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19201934. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Design Patent, #2 Exhibit Claim Chart)(Wawrzyn, Matthew) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (td, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wepay Global Payments LLC v. McDonald's Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wepay Global Payments LLC | |
Represented By: | Matthew Michael Wawrzyn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: McDonald's Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.