Cuaresma et al v. Softchoice Corporation
| Michael Cuaresma and Braxton Griffin |
| Softchoice Corporation |
| 1:2022cv01070 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER APPROVING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 4/14/2022. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Approval of Settlement under the FLSA, for Appointment of Settlement Administrator, for Approval of Service Awards, and for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Costs #4 is granted. Enter Order Approving Collective Action Settlement. Motion to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice with leave to reinstate on or before 60days after the Effective Date, and in the event a motion to reinstate is not filed on or before 60days after the Effective Date, the case shall be deemed, without further order or action of the Court,to be dismissed with prejudice. All pending dates before this court are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19214309. (Waxman, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Softchoice Corporation by Jennifer L. Schilling (Schilling, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Douglas M. Werman regarding motion for settlement, #4 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit B - Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Settlement and Consent to Join/Opt-in Form, #4 Exhibit D - Firm Resume)(Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by Michael Cuaresma, Braxton Griffin in support of motion for settlement, #4 (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiffs Michael Cuaresma, Braxton Griffin for settlement (Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Approval of Settlement under the FLSA, for Appointment of Settlement Administrator, for Approval of Service Awards, and for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Costs) (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Michael Cuaresma, Braxton Griffin by Douglas M. Werman (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Collective Action Complaint) filed by Michael Cuaresma, Braxton Griffin; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19202743.(Werman, Douglas) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (td, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
