GeLab Cosmetics LLC v. Chen
| GeLab Cosmetics LLC |
| Xueyan Chen |
| 1:2022cv01120 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GeLab Cosmetics LLC by Wei Wang (Wang, Wei) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GeLab Cosmetics LLC by Na Zhang (Zhang, Na) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by GeLab Cosmetics LLC by GeLab Cosmetics LLC (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 15 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 14 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by GeLab Cosmetics LLC (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by GeLab Cosmetics LLC re Motion for TRO and Motion for Electronic Service of Process (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Ruoting Men regarding memorandum in support of motion #11 (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by GeLab Cosmetics LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief #10 (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff GeLab Cosmetics LLC For Electronic Service of Process (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 9 DECLARATION of Xingwang Chen regarding memorandum in support of motion #7 (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Ruoting Men regarding memorandum in support of motion #7 (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by GeLab Cosmetics LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order #6 (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff GeLab Cosmetics LLC for temporary restraining order including a temporary injunction,a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery and temporary transfer of the Defendant's Domain Name (Men, Ruoting) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 5/18/2022 at 9:00 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (dal, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED (Corrected) Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR. |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GeLab Cosmetics LLC by Tao Liu (Liu, Tao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by GeLab Cosmetics LLC; Jury Deman. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19211418. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Registration Certificate, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Certificate of Formation, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Certificate of Formation, #4 Exhibit Ex. C - Certificate of Formation, #5 Exhibit Ex. D - Order history to Chicago, IL)(Men, Ruoting) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GeLab Cosmetics LLC v. Chen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GeLab Cosmetics LLC | |
| Represented By: | Tao Liu |
| Represented By: | Ruoting Men |
| Represented By: | Na Zhang |
| Represented By: | Wei Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Xueyan Chen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
