Paz y Paz v. Oasis Madison Inc. dba Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi et al
Plaintiff: Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz
Defendant: Oasis Madison Inc. dba Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi, Apidech Chotsuwan and Oasis Madison Inc. doing business as Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi
Case Number: 1:2022cv01205
Filed: March 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Z Lee
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2022 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendant's motion for extension of time until 6/27/22 to answer the complaint #12 is granted. The status hearing is reset for 6/29/22 at 9:00 a.m.The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. (ca, )
April 27, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Oasis Madison Inc. for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint (Formica, Vincent)
April 27, 2022 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Apidech Chotsuwan, Oasis Madison Inc. by William Edward Meyer, Jr (Meyer, William)
April 27, 2022 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Apidech Chotsuwan, Oasis Madison Inc. by Vincent Paul Formica, Jr (Formica, Vincent)
April 27, 2022 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz. Apidech Chotsuwan waiver sent on 4/26/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Schlade, Daniel)
April 27, 2022 Filing 8 STATUS Report Joint Report By All Parties by Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz (Schlade, Daniel)
April 27, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The status hearing set for 5/3/22 is reset for 5/12/22 at 9:00 a.m.The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. (ca, )
April 14, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz as to Oasis Madison Inc. on 3/12/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. (Dore, James)
April 14, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz as to Apidech Chotsuwan. (Dore, James)
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 5/3/22 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by 4/27/22. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The call-in number is 888-273-3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?4Qf5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. (ca, )
March 8, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, )
March 8, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, )
March 8, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Apidech Chotsuwan and Oasis Madison Inc. (lxk, )
March 7, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz by Daniel I Schlade (Schlade, Daniel)
March 7, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schlade, Daniel)
March 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19222906.(Schlade, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paz y Paz v. Oasis Madison Inc. dba Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcelino Alonzo Paz y Paz
Represented By: Daniel I Schlade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oasis Madison Inc. dba Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apidech Chotsuwan
Represented By: William Edward Meyer, Jr.
Represented By: Vincent Paul Formica, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oasis Madison Inc. doing business as Sumu Tokyo Ramen and Sushi
Represented By: William Edward Meyer, Jr.
Represented By: Vincent Paul Formica, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?