Toolis v. iRobot Corporation
Plaintiff: Thomas W. Toolis
Defendant: iRobot Corporation
Case Number: 1:2022cv01290
Filed: March 10, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Martha M Pacold
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #8 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 5/27/2022. The court will give the parties until 6/2/2022 to file an initial joint status report. (Attachment 1 Initial Joint Status Report Outline) (rao, ). Modified on 4/25/2022 (rao, ).
April 22, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant iRobot Corporation for extension of time (Martos, Martin)
April 22, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant iRobot Corporation by Gabrielle Winslow (Winslow, Gabrielle)
April 22, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant iRobot Corporation by Martin R. Martos, II (Martos, Martin)
March 24, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Thomas W. Toolis by Thomas Papanicolas (Papanicolas, Thomas)
March 24, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 5/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, )
March 11, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant iRobot Corporation (lma, )
March 10, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Thomas W. Toolis by Christopher Michael Jahnke (Jahnke, Christopher)
March 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Jahnke, Christopher)
March 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Thomas W. Toolis; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19235692. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jahnke, Christopher)
March 10, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, )
March 10, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toolis v. iRobot Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas W. Toolis
Represented By: Christopher Michael Jahnke
Represented By: Thomas Papanicolas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: iRobot Corporation
Represented By: Martin R. Martos, II
Represented By: Gabrielle Winslow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?