Royal v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Yolanda Royal
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc. and LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A, INC.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01304
Filed: March 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status hearing held on 5/5/2022. Attorney Adam Kress' motion to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted. Defendant's motion for extension of time #10 is granted. Deadline for the response to complaint is 5/26/2022. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are to be made by 6/9/2022. The parties are directed to file a joint status report with a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule by 6/16/2022. A telephonic status hearing is set for 6/21/2022 at 9:10 a.m. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Mailed notice. (mma, )
May 4, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A, INC. for extension of time of Enlargement (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(McConkey, James)
April 27, 2022 Filing 9 STATUS Report JOINT by Yolanda Royal (Kress, Adam)
April 27, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19381376. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Exhibit Cer of Good Standing)(Kress, Adam)
April 19, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 4/28/2022, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 5/5/2022 at 9:30 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk)
April 5, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A, INC., LG Electronics, Inc. by James William McConkey (McConkey, James)
March 17, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Royal regarding Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet & Exhibits served on Lynanne Gares on March 15, 2022 (Kress, Adam)
March 11, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yolanda Royal by Loren Michael Legorreta (Legorreta, Loren)
March 11, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yolanda Royal by Timothy S. Tomasik (Tomasik, Timothy)
March 11, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Tomasik, Timothy)
March 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Yolanda Royal; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19237805.(Tomasik, Timothy)
March 11, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A, INC., LG Electronics, Inc. (lma, )
March 11, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, )
March 11, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Royal v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Royal
Represented By: Loren Michael Legorreta
Represented By: Timothy S. Tomasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc.
Represented By: James William McConkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A, INC.
Represented By: James William McConkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?