Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. v. True Service Hospitality, LLC et al
| Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. |
| True Service Hospitality, LLC, Byline Bancorp, Inc., Neeraj Sethi and Satish Bhatia |
| 1:2022cv01359 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 16, as well as the returns of service, R. 11, 12, 13, Defendants True Service Hospitality, LLC, Satish Bhatia, and Neeraj Sethi are deemed in default for failure to timely respond to the complaint. On or before 05/26/2022, the Plaintiff and Defendant Byline Bank shall file a status report setting forth their respective (or agreed) positions on whether the default is reducible to a default judgment in a sum certain now, or must await resolution of the case against Byline Bank. With regard to the Plaintiff and Byline Bank, the following discovery schedule is set. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 05/27/2022. Fact discovery must be completed by 11/11/2022. **No summary judgment motion may be filed before the close of fact discovery without prior authorization of the Court.** Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or amend pleadings is 08/08/2022. The deadline to serve subpoenas is 08/22/2022, absent good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). By 10/03/2022, the parties shall file a Deposition Scheduling Report listing the depositions already taken and (more importantly) the remaining deponents, all of whom must have ***confirmed*** deposition dates (not just proposed dates). Any person not on that Report will presumptively not be deposed without good cause (e.g., genuine surprise despite due diligence). If deponents are slow in confirming deposition dates, the parties should use the Report deadline to urge each other and non-parties to provide confirmed dates to avoid a motion to compel in advance of the deadline. The parties do not contemplate retained-expert discovery. The tracking status hearing of 05/13/2022 is reset to 7/22/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a discovery progress report by 07/12/2022, by which time they should have exchanged written discovery responses. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 16 STATUS Report (JOINT INITIAL) by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. (Couch, Bryan) |
| Filing 15 Defendant Byline Bank's ANSWER to Complaint by Byline Bancorp, Inc.(Conlon, Carri) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Byline Bancorp, Inc. by Carri Ann Conlon Appearance on behalf of Defendant Byline Bank, incorrectly sued as Byline Bancorp, Inc. (Conlon, Carri) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. as to True Service Hospitality, LLC on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Couch, Bryan) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. as to Satish Bhatia on 4/16/2022, answer due 5/9/2022. (Couch, Bryan) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. as to Neeraj Sethi on 4/4/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Konkel, Brian) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. as to Byline Bancorp, Inc. on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. (Konkel, Brian) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/13/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 05/06/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Justin Vogel's motion to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff #7 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19262953. (Vogel, Justin) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Bryan Church's motion to appear pro hac vice for Plaintiff #5 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19254949. (Couch, Bryan) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Satish Bhatia, Byline Bancorp, Inc., Neeraj Sethi, True Service Hospitality, LLC (sxh, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. (Konkel, Brian) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc. by Brian Christopher Konkel (Konkel, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Additional Attorney of Record for Plaintiff)(Konkel, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Baymont Franchise Systems, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19247116. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F)(Konkel, Brian) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
