Van Ryswyk v. Kijakazi
| Amy Van Ryswyk |
| Acting Cm'r SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv01366 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Susan E Cox |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Haile, Jonathan) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 5/16/22 and deliver a courtesy copy to Room 1024. Pursuant to Local Rule 8.1(b), the Social Security Administration's filing of the certified administrative record, in and of itself, shall suffice as the agency's answer to the complaint. Plaintiff's opening brief is due on or before 7/15/2022. Defendant's response brief is due on or before 8/29/2022. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before 9/12/22. Mailed notice (gw, ) |
| Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Susan E. Cox for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C). Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/23/2022. (kl, ) |
| Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Haile, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Jonathan C. Haile as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Haile, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. The parties should promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Agree to file consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; 2) Do the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner? 3) If not, motions for summary judgment shall be briefed as follows: motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 60 days of the filing of the answer and administrative record. Response is due 45 days thereafter. Reply, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Amy Van Ryswyk for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Good, Neil) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Van Ryswyk by Neil H. Good (Good, Neil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Good, Neil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Administrative Review filed by Amy Van Ryswyk; (Good, Neil) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
