CIC Plus, Inc v. Dexheimer
| CIC Plus, Inc |
| Darrin Dexheimer |
| 1:2022cv01523 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MOTION by Plaintiff CIC Plus, Inc, Counter Defendant CIC Plus, Inc to strike Dexheimer's Affirmative Defenses (Shmikler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION by Plaintiff CIC Plus, Inc, Counter Defendant CIC Plus, Inc to dismiss Dexheimer's Counterclaims (Shmikler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 14
Corporate Disclosure Statement by CIC Plus, Inc (Shmikler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant CIC Plus, Inc.'s unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to counterclaims #12 is granted. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant CIC Plus, Inc. has until 5/11/2022 to answer or otherwise plead to the counterclaims. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION by Plaintiff CIC Plus, Inc, Counter Defendant CIC Plus, Inc for extension of time to file response/reply to Counterclaims (Unopposed) (Shmikler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM filed by Darrin Dexheimer against CIC Plus, Inc . by Darrin Dexheimer(Mell, Joan)
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIC Plus, Inc by Matthew H Rice (Rice, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIC Plus, Inc by Daniel A. Shmikler (Shmikler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Attorney Joan K. Mell's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #7 is granted. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19277506. (Mell, Joan)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 06/06/2022, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) by that date, the removing party's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of notice of removal by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice (axc).
|
|
Filing 5
MAILED notice of removal letter to counsel of record. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Darrin Dexheimer by Jamie Lynn Burns (Burns, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Darrin Dexheimer by Peter F. Donati (Donati, Peter)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Donati, Peter)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2022 CH 01379) filed by Darrin Dexheimer Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19275522. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Donati, Peter)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cm, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CIC Plus, Inc v. Dexheimer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CIC Plus, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Daniel A. Shmikler |
| Represented By: | Matthew H Rice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Darrin Dexheimer | |
| Represented By: | Jamie Lynn Burns |
| Represented By: | Peter F. Donati |
| Represented By: | Joan Kristine Mell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
