Ross v. De Marr et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Ross
Defendant: Danguole De Marr and Cargoplus, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01552
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: This case is dismissed with prejudice and without costs pursuant to the parties' stipulation. The order to show cause entered on 5/18/2022 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mma, )
May 18, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Shelist, Robert)
May 18, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status hearing held on 5/18/2022. Neither side appears. The parties have not filed a revised stipulation consistent with the 5/5/2022 order. The case is set for a further status hearing on 5/20/2022 at 9:10 a.m. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Both sides are ordered to show cause why a sanction should not be imposed for their failure to appear at the status hearing today. Mailed notice. (mma, )
May 5, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal that asks the Court to dismiss the case with prejudice and retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement. The Court advises that it cannot appropriately do this under governing Seventh Circuit law. The Court proposes two alternatives for the parties' consideration: (1) a stipulated dismissal with prejudice, with leave to reinstate the case by a specified date if the settlement is not completed; or (2) a stipulated dismissal without prejudice, with the dismissal to convert automatically to a dismissal with prejudice on a specified date unless a motion for reinstatement is filed before that date. (mk)
May 4, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Shelist, Robert)
April 23, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicholas Ross as to Danguole De Marr on 4/13/2022, answer due 5/4/2022. (Shelist, Robert)
April 23, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicholas Ross as to Cargoplus, Inc. on 4/13/2022, answer due 5/4/2022. (Shelist, Robert)
April 19, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 5/11/2022, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 5/18/2022 at 9:00 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk)
March 29, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nicholas Ross by Robert Joel Shelist (Shelist, Robert)
March 28, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, )
March 28, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )
March 28, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cargoplus, Inc. (jxj, )
March 25, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Shelist, Robert)
March 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nicholas Ross; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19279752.(Shelist, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. De Marr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Ross
Represented By: Robert Joel Shelist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danguole De Marr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cargoplus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?