Sonrai Memory Limited v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Sonrai Memory Limited
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv01606
Filed: March 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Elaine E Bucklo
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19499219. (Gibson, Erin)
May 24, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19499179. (Cunningham, Sean)
May 2, 2022 Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sonrai Memory Limited by George N. Vurdelja, Jr (Vurdelja, George)
April 29, 2022 Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Motorola Mobility LLC(Roberson, Ferlillia)
April 22, 2022 Filing 18 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Motorola Mobility LLC (Roberson, Ferlillia)
April 22, 2022 Filing 17 STIPULATION regarding complaint #1 - Stipulation For Extension Of Time (Roberson, Ferlillia)
April 22, 2022 Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC by Ferlillia V. Roberson (Roberson, Ferlillia)
April 14, 2022 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sonrai Memory Limited as to Motorola Mobility LLC on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022. (Hayden, Amy)
April 14, 2022 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Motions to appear pro hac vice #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 are granted. Scheduling conference set for 7/8/2022 at 09:45 AM (to track the case only; no appearance required). Joint Rule 26(f) planning report due 6/28/2022. (The form of the report can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.) The court will set a schedule based on the report. Mailed notice (reg)
April 13, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19340056. for James A. Milkey (Milkey, James)
April 11, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19333560. (Conkle, Christian)
April 11, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19333553. (Kroeger, Paul)
April 11, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19333461. (Shackelford, David)
April 11, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19333451. (Ma, Jonathan)
April 11, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-19333378. (Hayden, Amy)
March 30, 2022 Filing 7 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (jn, )
March 30, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC (ak, )
March 29, 2022 Filing 6 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Sonrai Memory Limited regarding complaint #1 (Vurdelja, George)
March 28, 2022 Filing 5 Local Rule 3.4 by Sonrai Memory Limited (Vurdelja, George)
March 28, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Related Cases by Sonrai Memory Limited (Vurdelja, George)
March 28, 2022 Filing 3 Plaintiff's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Sonrai Memory Limited (Vurdelja, George)
March 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Vurdelja, George)
March 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement Against Motorola Mobility LLC filed by Sonrai Memory Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19287840.(Vurdelja, George) (Docket text modified on 3/28/2022 (nsf, ).
March 28, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )
March 28, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sonrai Memory Limited v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonrai Memory Limited
Represented By: George N. Vurdelja, Jr.
Represented By: James Milkey
Represented By: Amy E Hayden
Represented By: Christian W Conkle
Represented By: David T Schakelford
Represented By: Jonathan Ma
Represented By: Paul A Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Represented By: Erin P. Gibson
Represented By: Ferlillia V. Roberson
Represented By: Sean C Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?