Young v. Garcia et al
Deandre Young |
J Garcia, Garcia and Cahue |
1:2022cv01747 |
April 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED a copy of order dated 05/03/2022 #7 and blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff Deandre Young at 6338 S. Latlin, Apt. 2, Chicago, IL 60636. (lxk, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) submit a renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as detailed in this order, or (2) pay the statutory $402 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order at: Plaintiff's current address identified on the docket (at the Cook County Jail); and, Plaintiff's last known private address on file with the Clerk's Office (6338 S. Latlin, Apt. 2, Chicago, IL 60636). Plaintiff is advised that he has a continuing obligation to keep the Court apprised of his current address and failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff must address his fee status, as set forth in this order, by no later than June 2, 2022 if he wishes to proceed with this lawsuit. If he fails to do so, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Court defers its review of Plaintiff's complaint #1 and motion for attorney representation #4 until Plaintiff resolves his fee status. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/3/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 6 MAIL RETURNED, for magistrate consent form sent to Deandre Young returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to 6338 S Latlin Apt 2 Chicago, IL 60636 (jk2, ) |
Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED, for acknowledgement letter for new case sent to Deandre Young returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to 6338 S Latlin Apt 2 Chicago, IL 60636 (jk2, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Deandre Young for attorney representation (jn, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Deandre Young for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (jn, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Deandre Young. (Envelope not postmarked). (jn, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Deandre Young. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.