Westfall v. Austin et al
Christopher T Westfall |
Austin and Attorney General of the state of Sangamon County |
1:2022cv01776 |
April 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS as case 3:22-cv-03077, filed 05/17/2022. (aee, ) |
Filing 6 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Central Illinois, Springfield the electronic record. (nsf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: This case is transferred forthwith to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, in Springfield, Illinois. The Clerk shall close this case on this Court's docket. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 5/5/2022. Mailed notice (nsf, ) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Christopher T Westfall dated 04/18/2022 (Envelope postmarked 04/26/2022). (lxk, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Christopher T Westfall against Attorney General of the State of Sangamon County, Austin. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Plaintiff Christopher T Westfall (jn, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.