Haley v. Tohatan, et al
Plaintiff: REUBEN HALEY
Defendant: Officer Nicu J. Tohatan, Star No. 18703, Sergeant Edward Ranzzoni, Star No. 1776,, Nicu J. Tohatan and Edward J. Ranzzoni
Case Number: 1:2022cv01785
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint (Dckt. No. #6 ) is granted. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by June 17, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
May 13, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Nicu J. Tohatan for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead UNOPPOSED (Perrone, Nicholas)
May 13, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Nicu J. Tohatan by Nicholas John Perrone (Perrone, Nicholas)
April 7, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by June 21, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at [email protected] to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
April 7, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, )
April 7, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, )
April 6, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff REUBEN HALEY by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward)
April 6, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff REUBEN HALEY by Peter T Sadelski (Sadelski, Peter)
April 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by REUBEN HALEY; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19319704. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sadelski, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haley v. Tohatan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REUBEN HALEY
Represented By: Edward M. Fox
Represented By: Peter T Sadelski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Nicu J. Tohatan, Star No. 18703
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Edward Ranzzoni, Star No. 1776,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicu J. Tohatan
Represented By: Nicholas John Perrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward J. Ranzzoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?