U.S. Bank National Association v. Wilson-Hawkins
| U.S. Bank National Association |
| Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins |
| 1:2022cv01799 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REMAND with certified copy of order dated 05/20/2022 and letter to to Circuit Court of Cook County via email. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the status report (Dckt. No. #14 ). The parties are discussing settlement. The Court encourages those discussions to continue in good faith. In the meantime, the Court is duty-bound to remand this case to state court, because Defendant removed it to federal court long after the deadline. The case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Cook County forthwith. The Court directs the parties to provide the state court with an update on settlement discussions within one week of arrival in state court. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 16 SEALED Letter by Defendant Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 15 STATUS Report by U.S. Bank National Association (Schroeder, Philip) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court hereby orders U.S. Bank to file a status report by May 12, 2022. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the status report filed by U.S. Bank. (Dckt. No. #12 ) Defendant made a settlement offer, and U.S. Bank intends to respond. The parties must file a status report no later than three business days after U.S. Bank responds to the settlement offer. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 12 STATUS Report by U.S. Bank National Association (Schroeder, Philip) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Status hearing held on April 19, 2022. This case is a 2015 foreclosure case involving the sale of a home. It was filed in 2015 in state court, and the state court entered judgment in 2017. The parties discussed whether the matter belongs in federal court. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court hereby remands this case to the Circuit Court of Cook County. This is the third time that a federal court in this district has remanded this case to state court. The Court understands that Defendant does not want her home to be sold, especially given that she has lived in the home for 55 years. This Court understands where Defendant is coming from. Even so, this Court has ruled that the case does not belong in federal court, so the case is going back to state court where it belongs. The Court directs Defendant not to remove this case to federal court again. Before this matter returns to state court, counsel shall file a joint status report about ongoing discussions by April 27, 2022. In light of the ruling, any and all pending motions such as the application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs (Dckt. No. #5 ) are denied as moot. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: This Court amends its prior minute entry dated April 11, 2022 as follows. (Dckt. No. #7 ) This Court meant to say that it is not at all clear that this case belongs in federal court (not state court). State courts are courts of general jurisdiction, so they can hear just about anything. That's not true of federal courts. So, Plaintiff must show cause why the case belongs here in federal court. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 9 Copy of filed complaint 15 CH 9072 by U.S. Bank National Association (Schroeder, Philip) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association by Philip J Schroeder (Schroeder, Philip) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the docket in this case, which Defendant removed from state court. It is a foreclosure case, and it is not at all clear that the case belongs in state court. The notice of removal did not include a copy of the complaint, in violation of 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). Plaintiff's counsel must file a copy of the complaint (given that Defendant is pro se) by April 13, 2022. A telephonic status hearing is set for April 19, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (888) 684-8852 and the access code is 9369830. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Plaintiff's counsel must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant, and ensure that she is aware of the need to participate in the hearing. Defendant must show cause why the case should not be remanded to state court. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 2 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (kl, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing by Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins (kl, ) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION by Defendant Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (kl, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Defendant Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED NOTICE of Removal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, case number 15CH09072 by Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins (kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Bank National Association v. Wilson-Hawkins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Philip J Schroeder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Corla J. Wilson-Hawkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
