Huhtamaki, Inc. v. Broadview Packaging, Inc.
| Huhtamaki, Inc. |
| Broadview Packaging, Inc. d/b/a Northwest Enterprises and Broadview Packaging, Inc. doing business as Northwest Enterprises |
| 1:2022cv01815 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel #10 is granted. Attorney Ryan B Hauer is given leave to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. Telephonic status hearing set for 6/9/22 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-808-6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Attorney Ryan B. Hauer to withdraw as attorney for Huhtamaki, Inc.. No party information provided (Hauer, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Huhtamaki, Inc. by John Aron Carnahan as Local Counsel (Carnahan, John) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Broadview Packaging, Inc. (ey, ) |
| Filing 8 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (ph, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Huhtamaki, Inc. re complaint #1 Notice of Claims Involving a Patent and Trademark pursuant to Local Rule 3.4 (Hauer, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Huhtamaki, Inc. (Hauer, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Huhtamaki, Inc. by Michael R Annis (Annis, Michael) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Huhtamaki, Inc. by Dustin Lee Taylor (Taylor, Dustin) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Huhtamaki, Inc. by Ryan B Hauer (Hauer, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hauer, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Huhtamaki, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19323413. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Hauer, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
