Guity v. Mangia Mangia Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Doris Guity
Defendant: Mangia Mangia, Inc., Miguel Perez and Eric Perez
Case Number: 1:2022cv01969
Filed: April 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Written status report is due by 7/25/2022. Mailed notice. (cp, )
May 25, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Doris Guity as to Mangia Mangia, Inc. on 5/5/2022, answer due 5/26/2022. (Schlade, Daniel)
May 25, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Doris Guity as to Miguel Perez on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (Schlade, Daniel)
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Doris Guity as to Eric Perez on 5/6/2022, answer due 5/27/2022. (Schlade, Daniel)
April 28, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Mangia Mangia, Inc., Eric Perez, Miguel Perez (kl, )
April 18, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, )
April 18, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, )
April 17, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Doris Guity by Daniel I Schlade (Schlade, Daniel)
April 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Doris Guity; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19350299. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schlade, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guity v. Mangia Mangia Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris Guity
Represented By: Daniel I Schlade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mangia Mangia, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?