Salser v. Jackson-Minor
| Timothy James Salser |
| Jackson-Minor |
| 1:2022cv01993 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is under advisement. If Plaintiff wants to proceed further, he must (1) explain in writing and under oath why, he believes, he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, and (2) submit a certified trust fund statement showing activity in his account from March 24, 2022, to the date he responds to this order. Alternatively, he may pay the Court's $402.00 filing fee. Payment may be made by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. Failure to fully comply with this order by June 16, 2022, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers review of Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A and ruling on his motion for attorney representation until after his fee status has been resolved. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 5/12/2022. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Timothy James Salser. (jh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy James Salser for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Timothy James Salser for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Timothy James Salser. (Envelope not Postmarked) (jh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Judge Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salser v. Jackson-Minor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy James Salser | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jackson-Minor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
