Yadav v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Rahul Yadav |
I.Q. Data International, Inc. |
1:2022cv02027 |
April 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Martha M Pacold |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the appearance of Alejandro E. Figueroa as counsel of record #7 is granted. Attorney Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa terminated. (rao, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Attorney Alejandro E. Figueroa to withdraw as attorney for Rahul Yadav. No party information provided (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 6/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Status Report outline) (rao, ) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rahul Yadav. I.Q. Data International, Inc. waiver sent on 4/25/2022, answer due 6/24/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rahul Yadav by Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa (Figueroa, Alejandro) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rahul Yadav by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rahul Yadav by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rahul Yadav; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19355079. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant I.Q. Data International, Inc. (jmk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yadav v. I.Q. Data International, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rahul Yadav | |
Represented By: | Alejandro Emmanuel Figueroa |
Represented By: | Eric Donald Coleman |
Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: I.Q. Data International, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.