Sippel Haas v. Stericycle, Inc.
| Heidi Sippel Haas |
| Stericycle, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv02071 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants the parties' joint motion to stay #18 , and hereby stays this matter through 9/6/22 to facilitate settlement discussions. The parties shall file a status report by 8/30/22 updating the Court on their efforts and proposing additional case management dates, including a revised responsive pleading deadline and initial discovery dates. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 19 (Joint) NOTICE of Motion by Margot Klein for presentment of motion to stay #18 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/16/2022 at 11:00 AM. (Klein, Margot) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant Stericycle, Inc. to stay (Joint) (Klein, Margot) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Heidi Sippel Haas of Withdrawal of Consent to Join Form (Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Heidi Sippel Haas Of Filing Consent Form To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Consent Form)(Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant Stericyle Inc.'s agreed motion for extension of time to file answer #11 is granted and any answer shall be filed on or before 6/17/2022. Motion hearing set for 6/2/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Stericycle, Inc. by Michael D. Ray (Ray, Michael) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Stericycle, Inc. by Michael H. Cramer (Cramer, Michael) |
| Filing 12 (Agreed) NOTICE of Motion by Margot Klein for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/2/2022 at 11:00 AM. (Klein, Margot) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Stericycle, Inc. for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Agreed) (Klein, Margot) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Stericycle, Inc. by Margot Klein (Klein, Margot) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Heidi Sippel Haas Of Filing Consent Form To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Consent Form)(Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 6/9/2022, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary,individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heidi Sippel Haas as to Stericycle, Inc. on 4/27/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. (Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Heidi Sippel Haas Of Filing Consent Forms To Join In Collective Action Under 29 U.S.C. 216(b) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Consent Forms)(Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heidi Sippel Haas by Max Phillip Barack (Barack, Max) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Stericycle, Inc. (ak, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heidi Sippel Haas by Hans Andrew Nilges (Nilges, Hans) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Heidi Sippel Haas by Robi Joseph Baishnab (Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Baishnab, Robi) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Heidi Sippel Haas; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19363966. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Consent Form)(Baishnab, Robi) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
