Hess et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
| Ryan Hess, Carolyn Johnson, Thomas McKee and Barbara Moss |
| 7-Eleven, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv02131 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Pursuant to plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal, and defendants having not answered or moved for summary judgment, this case is dismissed without prejudice and without taxation of fees or costs. Terminate civil case. (mss) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Third uncontested motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint #12 is granted. Defendant's response to the complaint is due 8/8/22 and the parties' initial status report is due 8/10/22. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 - Third Uncontested Motion For An Extension Of Time To Respond To The Complaint - (Roberts, Eric) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #10 is granted. Defendant's response to the complaint is due 7/25/22 and the parties' initial status report is now due by 7/27/2022. (mss) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 - Second Uncontested Motion For An Extension Of Time To Respond To The Complaint - (Roberts, Eric) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Barbara Moss, Ryan Hess, Thomas McKee, Carolyn Johnson as to 7-Eleven, Inc. on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Defendant's answer is due 6/23/22. The parties shall file a joint initial status report by 6/27/22. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 - Uncontested Motion For An Extension Of Time To Respond To The Complaint - (Roberts, Eric) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. by Eric Michael Roberts (Roberts, Eric) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. by Raj Niranjan Shah (Shah, Raj) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. by Norman Mitchell Leon (Leon, Norman) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ryan Hess, Carolyn Johnson, Thomas McKee, Barbara Moss by Jonathan Marc Jagher (Jagher, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ryan Hess, Carolyn Johnson, Thomas McKee, Barbara Moss by Brian M. Hogan (Hogan, Brian) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint filed by Barbara Moss, Ryan Hess, Thomas McKee, Carolyn Johnson; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19374357. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Klinger, Gary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
