Route Guidance Systems LLC v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC and Route Guidance Systems, LLC |
Salesforce.com, Inc. |
1:2022cv02279 |
May 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 183 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc. by Gina A. Jenero (Jenero, Gina) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc. by Benjamin E. Weed (Weed, Benjamin) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #9 is granted. Defendant's answer is due 7/29/22. The court expects counsel for defendant to enter an appearance promptly. The parties' report of their initial planning meeting is now due by 8/3/2022.(mss) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Route Guidance Systems, LLC for extension of time to file answer (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #7 is granted. Defendant's response to the complaint is due 6/29/22. By 7/8/22, the parties shall file a report of the parties' planning meeting pursuant to LPR 1.2. A template for the report setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_rules/LPR%20Appendix%20A.pdf. In addition to the information required in LPR Appendix A, the parties shall set forth the specific dates and events set by the local patent rules up through the opening claim construction briefs and also report on the status of any settlement discussions. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Route Guidance Systems, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Route Guidance Systems, LLC as to Salesforce.com, Inc. on 5/9/2022, answer due 5/30/2022. (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 5 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (daj, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Salesforce.com, Inc. (sxh, ) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC by Neil A Benchell (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed by ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19405903. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Benchell, Neil) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.