Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company et al v. Bright Haven Behavioral Health Center, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company and Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
Defendant: BRIGHT HAVEN BEHAVORIAL HEALTH CENTER, LTD., Samira Jimenez and Clarity Clinic LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv02311
Filed: May 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Joan B Gottschall
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: An initial status report and, if appropriate, case management plan is due on or before July 8, 2022. In conformity with General Order 21-0027 and due to the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court is ordering written status reports instead of routine oral status hearings. This includes initial status hearings and scheduling conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Judge Gottschall's website for the procedure for requesting a hearing and for requirements for status reports and discovery plans during the COVID-19 pandemic. No Rule 26(f) discovery plan should be submitted until all defendants have been served. If all defendants have not been served by the deadline for filing an initial status report, the report should so state and propose a deadline for filing a discovery plan. The parties are directed to discuss settlement and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. They are further directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery plan. See Judge Gottschall's civil case management packet regarding pretrial case management procedures at: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (sxw)
May 4, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America by Samuel R Leist (Leist, Samuel)
May 4, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, )
May 4, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, )
May 3, 2022 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America (Bannon, Christopher)
May 3, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company (Bannon, Christopher)
May 3, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America by Christopher J. Bannon (Bannon, Christopher)
May 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America; N/A. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19421318. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bannon, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company et al v. Bright Haven Behavioral Health Center, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
Represented By: Christopher J. Bannon
Represented By: Samuel R Leist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
Represented By: Christopher J. Bannon
Represented By: Samuel R Leist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIGHT HAVEN BEHAVORIAL HEALTH CENTER, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samira Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clarity Clinic LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?