Satterfield v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr.
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, Victor Vita of Vylla Home and Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv02331
Filed: May 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Gary Feinerman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 6/23/2022.Mailed notice.(jlj, )
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 6/23/2022.Mailed notice.(jlj, )
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, this case is dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The status hearing set for 6/30/2022 #10 is stricken. Motion for attorney representation #5 is denied as moot. Enter judgment order. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The status hearing set for 6/6/2022 #8 is stricken and re-set for 6/30/2022 at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr to the court's order to show cause (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing and Hearing) (cxr, )
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. Summonses shall not issue. By 5/24/2022, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine given that he is complaining of injuries caused by the entry of state court orders. Status hearing set for 6/6/2022 at 9:30 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr for attorney representation (jmk, )
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jmk, )
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr. (jmk, )
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (jmk, )
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr. (jmk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Satterfield v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victor Vita of Vylla Home
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?