Currey v. Kendall County Sheriff Dept et al
| Jacob Currey |
| Kendall County Sheriff Dept, Alyssa Ruth Thompson, Yorkville Police, Oswego Police and KenComm |
| 1:2022cv02366 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 4), together with his motion to supplement (Dkt. 5), are granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration immediately to deduct $19.33 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at the Cook County Jail and to the Court's Fiscal Department. Summons, however, shall not issue. Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint that states a federal claim against proper defendants. Failure to submit an amended complaint on or before July 15, 2022 will result in dismissal of this lawsuit for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation (Dkt. 3) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form, a blank USM-285 form, and instructions along with a copy of this order. See accompanying Statement for details. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/16/2022. Mailed notice (jn, )
|
| MAILED order dated 6/16/2022, #6 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Danville Correctional Center. (jn, ) Modified on 6/17/2022 (jn, ). Modified on 6/17/2022 (jn, ). |
| MAILED an Amended Complaint form, a blank USM-285 form and instructions, and order dated 6/16/2022, #6 to Jacob Currey. (jn, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Jacob Currey to supplement I.F.P. RE (D/e #4). (Exhibit). (jn, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to plaintiff. (nsf, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jacob Currey for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Attachment) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Jacob Currey for attorney representation. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Jacob Currey. (nsf, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (nsf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
